tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-185648912024-03-14T00:10:02.496+05:30Chiranth's BlogChiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.comBlogger146125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-55342323338638664042015-07-21T15:57:00.000+05:302015-07-22T14:50:14.879+05:30A GTD secret in Microsoft Outlook<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Every once in a while, my email processing goes completely off the rails and my inbox runs into hundreds (if not thousands) of unprocessed emails. Here's a handy setting in MS Outlook that lets me go super ninja when dealing with an overflowing inbox.<br />
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Go to <b>Outlook Options</b> --> <b>Mail</b> --> <b>Others</b> and look for the option <i>After moving or deleting an open item</i></div>
<div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcoMiEuesz3d4EauBhZE7GSW_bHzLB-aJ_Vivd3NJelR7sMGhxLAzVY7yrFYSGkmf4GfojUcYgwtcvvJc0XlxMmrfBoUfGmZnl2Eqcjoai41W6L37jkSIBHapE7wnUwVQ74Jva/s1600/Outlook-GTD-secret.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcoMiEuesz3d4EauBhZE7GSW_bHzLB-aJ_Vivd3NJelR7sMGhxLAzVY7yrFYSGkmf4GfojUcYgwtcvvJc0XlxMmrfBoUfGmZnl2Eqcjoai41W6L37jkSIBHapE7wnUwVQ74Jva/s320/Outlook-GTD-secret.png" width="287" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Setting this option to "Open the next item" forces one to deal with the next item in my inbox as soon as the current item is dealt with. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
This tip works very well if you have a bunch of <a href="http://codesteps.com/2014/02/23/outlook-create-a-quick-step/">Quick Steps</a> defined that take care of your most common actions.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Happy <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Getting-Things-Done-Stress-free-Productivity-ebook/dp/B00SHL3V8M">GTD</a>ing!</div>
</div>
<div>
<span id="goog_890996635"></span><span id="goog_890996636"></span><br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-68324919406858740092015-07-20T12:03:00.000+05:302015-07-20T20:12:03.050+05:30Simplify the Facebook newsfeed (and regain some sanity)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">There are a number of articles about how Facebook can cause or worsen depression. </span><br />
<div>
<br />
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li><a href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/21st-century-aging/201308/facebook-depression"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">Facebook Depression</span></a></li>
<li><a href="http://guardianlv.com/2013/08/facebook-causes-depression-new-study-says/"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">Facebook causes depression, new study says</span></a></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><a href="http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21583593-using-social-network-seems-make-people-more-miserable-get-life">Get a life!</a> </span></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">I can relate to some of these symptoms firsthand, and believe that there is a large dose of truth to what the above articles say. And I am guilty of having way too many Facebook friends. My friends' list is 800 people long not because I know all of them intimately, but because I was trying to be polite. I didn't want to offend them by declining their friends' request.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">So here's a fix I have been implementing on my Facebook news feed:</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrymagid/2013/12/03/how-to-unfollow-someyet-yet-still-be-facebook-friends/">Unfollow People</a></span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">Here's my rationale: I am not interested in the lives of all the 800 odd people on my friends' list. And unfollowing people is the one way to deal with the astounding amounts of clutter my newsfeed was serving me every time I log in. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">Yes, I am still following the absolute barest set of people whom I truly care about, or whose posts I find inspirational. And my newsfeed is now a bit sane.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-11417463385315508312015-07-12T20:28:00.000+05:302015-07-12T20:28:12.223+05:30Disabled and Differently-abled<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">Are we taking political correctness to extremes these days? I especially noticed this during the recent newspaper articles about <a href="http://www.firstpost.com/india/delhis-ira-singhal-tops-upsc-exams-women-beat-men-to-first-four-ranks-2327230.html">Ira Singhal</a>, the candidate who topped the latest UPSC exams. Ira Singhal suffers from scoliosis, an abnormal curvature of the spine. Some new<span style="text-align: -webkit-auto;">s articles were calling h</span></span><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif; text-align: -webkit-auto;">er "differently-abled" instead of "disabled", presumably for the sake of political correctness. </span><br />
<div style="orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; widows: 2;">
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; widows: 2;">
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">Why is "disabled"<i> </i>considered a negative word? It really shouldn't, should it? It is a fairly objective word to describe that a specific human body is not capable of what might be considered ordinary by others.</span></div>
<div style="orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; widows: 2;">
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><br clear="none" /></span>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">Yeah, someone might argue that she topped the UPSC this year, and that is her <i>different</i> ability. But hey, so did some non-handicapped person last year - his name was Gaurav Agarwal. The media weren't calling <i>him</i> differently-abled now, were they?
</span><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><br clear="none" /></span>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">I don't intend to sound judgmental against Ira Singhal, but from what I have read about her, there is nothing differently abled about her. She is a really smart person who happens to have a sub-optimal curvature of the spine. If the word "disabled" is the official Oxford Dictionary term used to describe, albeit in a generic manner, this condition, then there is nothing politically incorrect about it.</span><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;"><br clear="none" /></span>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;">Coming to the point of <i>differently-abled</i>, there are two TED talks that got me thinking about what differently abled really means.</span><div>
<ol style="text-align: left;">
<li><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><a href="http://www.npr.org/2014/09/12/342135819/could-genetics-hold-the-answer-to-curing-autism">Could Genetics Hold the Answer to Curing Autism</a> - Wendy Chung is a researcher focusing on genetic causes of autism and explains</span><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif; text-align: -webkit-auto;"> that Autism is not a disease, but a spectrum of diseases. And often, a child can have a trade-off of one skill in favor of another. E.g. when growing up, a child may not learn to make eye contact, but can be super smart in math at the time. Perhaps that is what the term <i>differently abled</i> should mean.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><a href="http://www.npr.org/2014/09/19/347414978/how-do-you-reinvent-yourself-after-a-near-death-experience">How Do You Reinvent Yourself After a Near-Death Experience?</a> - This one must be one the most inspirational TED talks out there. Hugh Herr shows how to convert disability to opportunity in the truest of senses, and to expand human capability. I preferred the Guy Roz interview of Hugh Herr to the actual TED talk. Please do click on <b>Listen to the Story</b> at the <a href="http://www.npr.org/2014/09/19/347414978/how-do-you-reinvent-yourself-after-a-near-death-experience">NPR link</a> before you watch the video. </span></li>
</ol>
<span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif; text-align: -webkit-auto;">My favorite line from Hugh Herr's talk is "</span><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif; text-align: -webkit-auto;">So when I was feeling badly about myself, insecure I would jack my height up. </span><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif; text-align: -webkit-auto;">But when I was feeling confident and suave, I would knock my height down a notch just to give the competition a chance.</span><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif; text-align: -webkit-auto;">" <i>Just to give the competition a chance?</i> Isn't that the attitude that exemplifies what "differently abled" should mean? And honestly, that is kind of different ability I personally would love to cultivate.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif; text-align: -webkit-auto;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', sans-serif; text-align: -webkit-auto;">So in my opinion, calling the disabled as differently-abled purely for reasons of political correctness is not right. As long as one does not use the word "disabled" with contempt, there is no disrespect in using that word. And let's save the phrase "differently abled" for those who truly are.</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-39210219027672109582013-09-10T15:56:00.000+05:302013-09-10T15:58:45.166+05:30Book review: Immortals of Meluha<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDk49aG67qJ72B80wT-vg0n_gtLFWlR4f-QUXNn8PvAUXDyBAgQaRZ4UvG9qHjij2vsmaqlKDbg77Ak9hKiaYNtpI8n_1wfela5M-0piDWS2oK9yEIFn3a0fiwubCaey5LLB7p/s1600/51-CeSqDPlL.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDk49aG67qJ72B80wT-vg0n_gtLFWlR4f-QUXNn8PvAUXDyBAgQaRZ4UvG9qHjij2vsmaqlKDbg77Ak9hKiaYNtpI8n_1wfela5M-0piDWS2oK9yEIFn3a0fiwubCaey5LLB7p/s200/51-CeSqDPlL.jpg" width="129" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: start;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">Turned out to be a good read, but thankfully I did not have too many expectations to begin with.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">I had heard a lot of positive reviews of this trilogy, and decided to pick it up when I found it in the Kindle ebook format. The author has done a pretty good job of "humanizing" Shiva, and seems to have set a decent stage for the next book, where I suspect the real action will begin (I haven't read that book yet).</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>PROBABLY A SPOILER:</b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">The author also has an interesting take on the societies of the Suryavanshis and Chandravanshis. IMO, both societies do not fulfill the principles of a true Utopian "Ram Rajya", i.e. the Suryavanshi society is almost Dystopian, while the Chandravanshi society is almost anarchaic / chaotic. I use the word "almost" because in spite of the flaws in these societies, citizens of both appear to be highly contented, which is uncharacteristic of true Dystopian and Anarchaic societies. The author has presented the duality of these two societies in a fairly simplistic and easy-to-understand manner, which is quite commendable.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">The book is fairly easy to read, and I would recommend it to anyone interested in an alternative take on Indian mythology. It might help readers knowing a bit about traditional Indian mythology in advance, to truly appreciate how the author deviates from it.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>NEGATIVE:</b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">There are quite a few spelling errors in the book - not sure if that's there in the original print publication, or if it is true for the Kindle format. If not for this, I would've given it 4 stars.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">Overall: I am looking forward to reading the next book in the trilogy.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: start;">
<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">(Review also posted to Amazon at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/R3ICA3KUB60MWJ">http://www.amazon.com/review/R3ICA3KUB60MWJ</a>)</span></div>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: start;">
</span><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-75172620577317099172013-04-19T16:39:00.000+05:302015-07-20T19:12:11.897+05:30T-bar row self-challenge<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
In March last year, I attempted a T-bar row challenge in the gym. The idea was to stack up all the weights that were available in my gym (40 kgs in all) and do 5 reps of a one-armed T-bar row.<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Here's the video from that attempt:</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/G3hfwLgb1OI?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I did complete the five reps on the left hand, albeit with a break (my palms got really sweaty).</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Since that time, I've been through a big down-phase in my workout routine, and only in the last few months have I been slowly recovering my former strength.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
So my challenge for next week is simple - to repeat the same workout, but with 10 reps for each hand. This time around, I will be using wrist straps to eliminate the strain on my wrists and the pesky palm sweat.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I'm going to do this early next week, and have one of my gym buddies shoot a video of my attempt. Will post the video, whether I succeed or fail. Wish me luck!<br />
<br />
<b>[Update 25th April]</b> I still haven't been able to hit the gym this week... thanks to a training I've been attending. But this challenge is still top priority - will update this space soon!<br />
<br />
<b>[Update: 30th April]</b> Completed the challenge!! Shall post the video in a few days</div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-55743318591927687422012-12-26T16:32:00.001+05:302012-12-26T16:32:16.179+05:30Alternate push-up styles to return from a gym break<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
This year, December has been surprisingly heavy work-wise. For some reason, all of our clients and prospects have asked for a million deliverables before they go on leave. Thanks to whirlwind of activity at work and a personal trip out of town, I wasn't able to hit the gym for almost 10 full days.<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
When I got back to the gym this Monday (my usual chest day), I decided to try something different. Instead of using the bench press to hit the chest in isolation, I opted to do a series of push-up variations so that I'd hit more body parts than just the chest. Here's how my workout turned out to be:</div>
<div>
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>2 sets of regular pushups: This is more like a warm-up</li>
<li>2 sets of spiderman push ups (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKBeHALPsSU">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKBeHALPsSU</a>): The unevenness of the weight distribution hits the obliques in addition to the chest.</li>
<li>2 sets of scorpion push ups (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_26f6HTbYn8">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_26f6HTbYn8</a> 0:34 to 0:47): This one does a fantastic job of hitting your core and stretching out your quads. And the raised leg makes for greater stress on your chest.</li>
<li>2 sets of dumbbell push ups (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0h1wmPf7YY">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0h1wmPf7YY</a>): One needs to do this using round dumbbells and not hexagonal ones. Since the round dumbbells tend to roll, one has to make use of shoulder muscles just to stabilize the dumbbells, thus making this exercise double up as a shoulder workout. A precaution: this workout can strain the wrists. It helps if this is the last workout so that the wrists don't get strained any further.</li>
</ul>
<div>
So, I did each of these sets with 12 repetitions. So that makes a total of 8 x 12 = 96 push ups. With all the rest breaks, I was wrapped up in a matter of 20-25 minutes.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I think that made for an effective workout, especially since I was getting back from a break :)</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-49443814346485532062012-11-26T15:53:00.004+05:302012-11-28T16:41:21.493+05:30What does not kill you...<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<i>... makes you stronger</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
And this is especially true for a fitness routine, <u>provided</u>:<br />
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>You are giving yourself adequate rest between your workouts</li>
<li>Your nutrition is aiding the strengthening process</li>
<li>Your workout program is holistic, i.e. you're not injuring one body part for the sake of strengthening another. Examples of not following this principle include workout routines that cause <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repetitive_strain_injury">RSI</a></li>
<li>You are pushing yourself to the maximum each time you work out. This is the principle of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_overload">progressive overload</a>. There are exceptions though: one shouldn't train to failure when hitting the tendons (e.g. with pull-ups, chin-ups)</li>
</ul>
Yes, there are prerequisites to every fancy rule.<br />
<br /></div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-22185109001327021122012-11-25T08:47:00.000+05:302012-11-25T08:47:08.144+05:30Stupid pigeon<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
A window was open, but no one in the house had realised it. Insomniac that I am, I couldn't help notice (at 3AM) the flutter of wings coming from the room with the open window. When I walked into the room, I could count at least three pigeons, with more in the queue to come in to the room through the open window. I attempted to block the window to stop the onslaught of new pigeons, and simultaneously (in hindsight, attempting this simultaneously was a mistake) shoo away the ones already in.<br />
<br />
Sometime during the ruckus that emerged with me and the pigeons, one of the pigeons managed to flutter around me and peck at my neck a million times. It must've been a gruesome sight to see me fend myself from the pigeon.<br />
<br />
Fast forward to the next day: I'm at the clinic, and the doctor (pretty young thing, by the way) is describing how pigeons carry all sorts of dreaded germs, and that I need to take a bunch of antibiotic and antiviral injections as a precaution. I took all this with the same calmness with which I fended off the pigeon the previous night. And then she started administering the first shot - perhaps it was an anti-rabies thing.<br />
<br />
So there I was in my dream, getting a shot from a doctor, and simultaneously in real-life, my heart starts pounding away at 160 beats per minute. And here I am now, well before 9 AM, blogging about how a stupid imaginary pigeon managed to wake me up this early on a Sunday.</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-35699447389331217812012-11-02T08:43:00.002+05:302012-11-26T01:31:12.146+05:30Avoiding the "side-effect" syndrome of fitness goals<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
A comprehensive fitness program should produce results in the following three parameters:<br />
<ul>
<li>Strength</li>
<li>Endurance</li>
<li>Flexibility</li>
</ul>
<div>
Any results outside these three parameters are mere <i>side effects</i>. Let me repeat: <u>any results outside these three parameters are mere side effects.</u> And I am not implying any negative connotation when I use the term <i>side effect.</i> Some of these side effects include changes to posture, immunity levels, body fat level, weight, sleeping patterns, appetite, etc. As one can see, the list of these side effects can be really long. And <u>classifying these side effects as a positive or negative depends on the individual and their context</u>. E.g. weight loss may be a good thing if you're just coming off a holiday season during which you've binged a lot. But it is probably not a good thing if you're already in the underweight zone on the BMI scale (or any other metric that you're following).</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Now, it's quite common to see ourselves setting goals focussed exclusively on these side effects: in fact, it's usually one of the reason people start to hit the gym, isn't it? Typical comments one gets to hear from newcomers is, "I need to lose at least five kilos before my cousin's wedding." This is short-term mentality at its best.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
If you are following a fitness program that is focussed on any of these side effects while compromising on the three fitness parameters listed above (strength, endurance, flexibility), you're doing yourself more harm than good. In fact, even if you are focusing on one of those three parameters while compromising on the other two, you are doing your body a disservice in the long run. So, please set yourself holistic fitness goals, and follow a program that does not compromise on these three parameters. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Comments welcome.<br />
<br />
<br />
[Update: Retitled this post]</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-54944505042327680292012-10-20T09:34:00.002+05:302012-10-22T19:15:09.952+05:30Pocket: Online Reading List Manager<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: left;">
Found this handy tool to manage my online reading: <a href="http://getpocket.com/">http://getpocket.com/</a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
This is a rather neat app that allows the user to manage your online reading lists across your multiple devices: computer, phone, iPod / tablet – they have a reasonably good app for iPod, I’m yet to check out the Android version.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
I’m still trying to figure out how to incorporate this into my GTD workflow, but here's what I'm thinking:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>Link to page received (from Google Reader, Google News, or links shared by email, IM, etc.)</li>
<li>If can’t read within 2 mins, add to pocket</li>
<li>Look through Pocket list of “reading material” – read top priority</li>
<li>For items to be saved/shared: bookmark them | save with notes to Evernote | share with contacts. Else mark as read, and be done with.</li>
</ul>
<div>
By the way, I had used the previous avatar of this tool (ReadItLater), but I'm realizing the benefit of this tool now since I started using iOS and Android.<br />
<br />
<b>[Update - 22 Oct 2012]</b><br />
Found this nice read on Pocket: <a href="http://www.macstories.net/news/read-it-later-reborn-pocket-saves-everything-for-later/">http://www.macstories.net/news/read-it-later-reborn-pocket-saves-everything-for-later/</a><br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-59389553545014590722012-09-24T15:03:00.002+05:302012-10-22T18:57:49.620+05:30Too busy to work out?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
If you are, check this athlete out:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/qaXfFRx5ZWw?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div>
<br />
More about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohan_Murphy">Rohan Murphy</a> is available on wikipedia. One snippet that caught my eye was that he won bronze at 2006 IPC World Powerlifting by lifting 127.5 kgs, and he's all of 56 kilos!<br />
<br />
I'll probably never gain that kind of upper body strength, but <b>may I be damned if I don't even put in the effort to get fitter</b>.</div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-31736574385215807482012-09-04T12:27:00.001+05:302012-09-04T12:42:37.666+05:30On Fitness Goals<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: left;">
People (usually the overweight ones hitting the gym for the first time) often set themselves a goal that goes like,</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>I need to lose 5 kilos in the next month.</i></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Instead, how about setting a goal such as:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>I am going to hit the gym 20 times in the next month.</i></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Isn't setting an effort-based-goal (the number of times to hit the gym) better than an end-result-goal (the targeted weight loss)? I think so, and here's why:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li><b>Control:</b> Your achievement of the goal is pretty much under your control. You know what you need to do in order to hit the gym 5 times this week (reduce the time you spend at office, cancel that dinner, etc.), but you can never really control all the variables it takes to hit your weight loss target, which for all you know, may be completely unrealistic. </li>
<li><b>Testing your commitment:</b> We've all heard stories of people who take up a fitness program only to give up within a few short weeks (months if they're lucky) simply because they were unable to meet their "target". The usual suspect for such a discontinuation is their lack of commitment to their fitness program. Setting a goal around the effort one is willing to put in helps you test how committed you really are.</li>
<li><b>Course-Correction:</b> You'll know early enough if you're taking any short-cuts and can take corrective action. If you find that all of your gym sessions are lasting less than 15 mins, you know you're not being true to your objective. But with the weight loss goal, it gets more complicated. Just because you lose 1kg in one week does not mean you're on-track to meeting your weight loss objective.</li>
<li><b>Sustainability:</b> The goals around effort are more sustainable. It's realistic and sustainable (but probably not easy) to extend the goal to say, <i>I'll hit the gym 20 times per month for the next 12 months</i>. Try doing that with the weight loss goal. </li>
<li><b>Fine-tuning:</b> It's also easier to fine-tune the goal statement around your effort:<br /><i>I will hit the gym 20 times in the next month to have 15 weight training and 5 cardio sessions.</i>
<br />But it's almost funny to hear someone say,<br /><i>I will lose 5 kgs, of which 4 kgs should be body fat, 0.5 kg water, and 0.5 kg lean muscle.</i>
<br />Perhaps expert body builders can set themselves goal statements like this, but then the keyword is "expert".</li>
</ul>
<div>
I believe that the goals around weight loss / fat loss / body tone should be set up after one has set up a sustainable fitness program. So before you set yourself goals around end-results, do set up realistic goals that will help you enjoy and stay committed to your fitness program. Without that, achieving your end-results will simply not feel rewarding enough, and definitely not fun! </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Would love to hear what others have to say.</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-54787073323537672152011-09-25T22:56:00.000+05:302011-09-26T12:50:00.294+05:30But walking is the best exercise!<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This is my third attempt with weight training, and at 10 months, my longest attempt so far. And I'm glad of the progress I have made this time: I certainly don't feel like a beginner any more - I can talk the gobbledygook of GH and leptin levels, and the differences between a stiff-legged deadlift and a Romanian deadlift :) But I'm also not an expert - there have been plenty of occasions where I have overtrained, and experienced soreness for days. </span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The typical beginner (and I could count myself as one when I started) encounters many problems when starting out with bodybuilding - there isn't adequate time to devote to the activity, form is always an issue, minor injuries keep occurring, the list goes on and on. Beyond these, an issue that pops up is that <b>one's support structure (friends, family, etc.) is not always supportive of an individual's weight training</b>. Even my doctor said, "You don't need weight training, cardiovascular endurance should be more than adequate." Another common comment I keep hearing is "Walking should be enough. It's the best exercise!"</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i>Walking is the best exercise</i> - Really? Best for what? Can one set a goal saying "I'll walk till the strength in my shoulders improves"? How does walking help improve the flexibility of the neck?</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I'm not trying to make fun of walkers or cardiovascular exercises. In fact, I enjoy both running and cycling - I don't run very regularly, but I love doing a 25 klick cycle ride as often as I can. But doing a cardiovascular activity in isolation can do the body a lot more harm than good. Let me elaborate:</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><u>Running long distances hurts the knees</u> [google for the phrase "joggers' knee" - it will flood your browser with a zillion results] - Seasoned runners know they have to complement their running with specific exercises for the glutes, hamstrings, and the back, in addition to the pre-run stretches</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><u>Cycling is a great exercise, but can take a toll on the back</u>. It's unnatural for the body to be crouched down for long periods, and this leads to muscle fatigue. <a href="http://www.ultracycling.com/training/resistance_training1.html">Ultracycling.com</a> lays out some resistance training tips for cyclists (and swimmers). Even <a href="http://www.gametimeworkouts.com/2008/03/lance-armstrongs-3-month-training.html">Lance Armstrong's training program</a> mentions a few points on weight training - I would assume this includes <i>hyperextension</i> exercises for the back.</span></li>
</ul>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Now, walking may not be as intensive as running or cycling, so the wear & tear takes longer to appear, but as I sarcastically mentioned earlier, it can not help the body parts that it doesn't work out: <b>walking can not help improve upper body strength and flexibility</b>. </span></div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span><br />
<ul style="text-align: left;">
</ul>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">So, here's my opinion: it helps the body more if a cardiovascular activity is done as part of a more <b>comprehensive fitness program</b> that ensures:</span></div>
<div>
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Coverage of as many muscle groups as possible</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Increase in strength of muscles and joints</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Increase in flexibility of the overall body</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Endurance [the cardio will probably take care of that]</span></li>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Now, body building isn't the only option to meet the above criteria. Other options include <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calisthenics">calisthenics</a>, <a href="http://www.artofliving.org/what-is-yoga">yoga</a>, and <a href="http://pilates.about.com/od/whatispilates/a/WhatIsPilates.htm">pilates</a>, to name a few. So, <b>pick one, and give your body the full-fledged fitness regimen it deserves</b>. And please don't let others brainwash you by saying, "Exercise X is the best exercise."</span></div>
</div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-84476960801407242982011-09-25T01:07:00.003+05:302011-09-26T23:04:45.991+05:30Workout lessons (learned the hard way)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Some lessons I've learned while weight training, especially in the last few months:</span><br />
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><span class="Apple-style-span">The back and legs have the largest largest muscle groups in the body, and working them out (even for a short duration) not only strengthens these muscles, but also affects the body's overall physiology. More experienced weight trainers refer to this effect as the GH boost. Lesson: If one can work out for only two days a week, it should be for the back and legs, instead of the chest, biceps, shoulders, etc. [but one should work out more often to include them as well]</span></span></li>
<li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><span class="Apple-style-span">If the body is excessively sore after working out, it helps to feed on some carbs. Carbs do aid in recovery, and can help get back to the gym the next day. Of course, it helps if the carbs are not made of refined sugars :-)</span></span></li>
<li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><span class="Apple-style-span">Compound exercises work out more muscle groups than isolation exercises, and a lot of them end up hitting the core muscles. Again, if stuck for time, compound exercises are the way to go.</span></span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: left;">
</ul>
</div>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-64979772148088299202011-09-13T14:14:00.002+05:302011-09-25T01:08:45.923+05:30gmap pedometer<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: left;">
If you're interested in trying cycling or running, check out gmap pedometer at <a href="http://gmap-pedometer.com/">http://gmap-pedometer.com/</a> It allows you to mark the routes you've taken on google maps interface. And yes, you can save routes for posterity. If only I could get symbian phone to work with this :(</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
In other news, I did a 41K ride last weekend, around the Bannerghatt National Park. I now know how hilly Bangalore really is :)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
</div>
</div>
Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-16383706651582078642011-06-23T15:52:00.002+05:302011-06-23T15:56:18.077+05:30The Pain Killer Cycle<div style="text-align: left;"><ul><li>Wake up with a terribly sore neck</li><li>Take pain killers</li><li>Feel drowsy from the pain killers</li><li>Cancel whatever appointments you have</li><li>Fall asleep</li><li>Wake up with more soreness in the neck :(</li></ul></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">How many pain killer cycles can one handle?</div><div><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"></div>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-85913546136251828712009-02-14T12:35:00.004+05:302009-02-14T12:42:42.356+05:30FastTrack gone offtrack with its advertising?<div style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.radioone.in/index_bangalore.asp">Radio One</a> was recently airing some advertising for FastTrack’s new <a href="http://weeksupdate.com/2009/01/fast-track-army-collection.html">Army Collection</a>. They were inviting women to send in jingles that go with a marching tune, and played a sample jingle on air. Here are the lyrics to that sample:<br /><blockquote style="font-style: italic;">Get up and leave<br />if he tries to kiss your hand<br />He’s a one-girl man;<br />He ain’t a one-night stand<br /></blockquote><span style="font-weight: bold;">Corollary:</span> if one comes across a girl wearing a Fast Track army watch, can one presume she is looking for a one-night-stand?<br /><br />Jokes apart, why would FastTrack want to restrict their customer base to an ultra-liberal crowd instead of having mass appeal to the entire 18-25 age group, irrespective of how conservative/liberal they are, irrespective of what their preferences in relationships are? Does their advertising tactic make sense for a consumer products' company?<br /></div>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-9096198655498413242009-02-14T11:20:00.001+05:302009-02-14T11:20:58.714+05:30A thought on Friday, the 13th<div style="text-align: justify;">Doesn't the 14th of Feb impose an unnecessary, unwarranted, and artificial deadline on a Work-In-Progress situation?<br /></div>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-90641704446239814412009-02-14T11:16:00.000+05:302009-02-14T11:17:54.133+05:30Work updateI've joined Adea Technologies (<a href="http://www.adea.com">www.adea.com</a>) more than a month back. Yeah, I used to work here earlier too. Familiar people, familiar work, let's see how this stint goes.<br /><br /><div style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-21159551706495406492009-01-12T04:34:00.001+05:302009-01-12T04:37:55.152+05:30Ghajini: lost opportunity<div style="text-align: justify;">Take a look at the ingredients: a weird case of short term memory loss, a dedicated actor who’s chiseled himself for this role, and pretty good direction – one would have expected so much more from Ghajini.<br /><br />Of course I am biased by Memento, and I’m glad that Ghajini wasn’t a copy. But the story could’ve been made so much more complex and thrilling. Instead, they chose a fairly simple story line in which no serious complications arise out of Sanjay’s anterograde amnesia. He seems to have a system that works fairly well: except when his enemies ruin it for him. And then it follows the traditional good-guy-gets-rid-of-bad-guy.<br /><br />Well, here’s the thing about Sanjay’s condition. He could have felt the rage of losing his girlfriend every 15 minutes, or whenever he saw himself in the mirror. But there’s only one scene which shows that, but it’s for the benefit of advancing the story – it doesn’t add much to Sanjay’s character. Why didn’t the director repeat that scene a few times, so that the character’s condition could be more ingrained in the viewer’s head?<br /><br />Why doesn't the movie explore Sanjay's psyche, and have him narrate the thoughts that are running in his head? The man would be under such tremendous confusion trying to figure out what’s happening around him – why not unleash that confusion on to the audience?<br /><br />Why does the story, instead of making it bigger with the endless possibilities of anterograde amnesia, choose to talk about the courtship between a millionaire and an aspiring model? Couldn’t all that material have been saved for a different yuppy movie?<br /><br />I’m glad I watched Ghajini, and I did like the movie. But I guess I had my hopes up way too high.<br /></div>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-1792486599299769552008-09-04T01:18:00.001+05:302008-09-04T01:21:41.396+05:30FaithFaithful : unfaithful : faithless :: love : hate : indifference<div style="text-align: justify;"><br /><span style="font-size:78%;">came up with this one when listening to <a href="http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/eagles/doolindalton.html">Doolin Dalton</a></span><br /></div>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-42358192484167074272008-08-15T02:33:00.006+05:302008-08-15T03:31:54.043+05:30Quick retorts by single blokesMarried people, please move on. This post is not for you.<br /><br />Single folk, especially those under immense pressure from their families to jump into something that you don’t want to contemplate right now, please stand by… we may be able to help each other out.<br /><br />Given that I have had a lot of time on my hands (see <a href="http://chiranth.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-career-news.html">previous post</a>), I decided to call my parents over to Hyderabad. And since I knew I was going to be home pretty much all the time, I asked them to come over on an extended stay. Exactly five hours before my parents arrived, it hit me that I could have a repeat of all the conversations I have had with them about marriage and how I’m not particularly thrilled by the idea of arranged marriages.<br /><br />My scared self wishes to put together a collection of well-reasoned retorts that are sure to terminate any such conversation around arranged marriages, in favour of the single bloke. If you can add on to this list that I’m putting together, you would be helping out more than one poor soul:<br /><ul><li>Parents: <span style="font-style: italic;">We would like you to get married to someone all of us are comfortable with<br /></span>Single bloke: <span style="font-style: italic;">Are you thinking of my car?</span></li><li>Parents: <span style="font-style: italic;">What’s wrong with an arranged marriage?</span><br />Single bloke: <span style="font-style: italic;">You cannot arrange a marriage; you can only arrange a wedding. Ergo …</span></li><li>Parents: <span style="font-style: italic;">We’ve found a lovely girl for you</span><br />Single bloke: <span style="font-style: italic;">I’ve found a red apple for you</span></li><li>Parents: <span style="font-style: italic;">Even your friend X was OK with an arranged marriage. Why was it OK with him?</span><br />Single bloke: <span style="font-style: italic;">Information Asymmetry?</span> -- raise your eyebrows as you say this<span style="font-style: italic;"><br /></span></li><li>Parents: <span style="font-style: italic;">Do you know how many good offers you have been getting?</span><br />Single bloke: <span style="font-style: italic;">A good offer in a bad system still counts as a bad offer</span></li><li>Parents: <span style="font-style: italic;">Don’t you want a wife who can cook?</span><br />Single bloke: <span style="font-style: italic;">You know, I bought this microwave oven last month and I still haven’t figured out how it works…</span><br /></li></ul>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-22425887392605427252008-08-14T03:28:00.001+05:302008-08-14T03:34:05.882+05:30Some career news<div style="text-align: justify;">I’ve quit my job of over a year. Nothing went wrong, but nothing went seriously right either. As of now, I’m in the market looking for a job. Actually not just yet – I plan to take some time off to think about myself, life, and everything that comes with it. Perhaps in a few weeks I’ll freak out about unemployment, and get serious about the third draft of my resume. In the meantime, Chi has more time to dedicate to his blog :-)<br /><br /></div>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-85637839437781999902008-08-08T02:49:00.004+05:302008-08-08T02:54:47.110+05:30<p>I'm only human<br />I seek what I love<br />I chase what I seek<br />I may affront what I chase<br />'Tis a chance I have to take<br /></p>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18564891.post-9848182095288147052008-08-06T00:55:00.003+05:302008-08-06T07:45:20.392+05:30Noble<div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify">There is the language that we read, and then there's language that we speak. The two are completely different animals: often, we come across words that we read but never use.</div><br /><div style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify">What if we could speak the way our favourite authors write? Would that show what our true character really is? If I used the word "noble" in a conversation, does that truly mean what I was describing was indeed noble?</div>Chiranth Channappahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00105862487907754218noreply@blogger.com0